World Economic Forum discussion

@ElsieDee are you worried about this event that WEF are arranging, or what are you saying?

1 Like

I am assuming that the exercise precedes a contrived cyber attack which will expedite the progress of the WEF ‘Great Reset’ - already smoothly facilitated by the advent of bsl4 lab-derived SARS-Cov-2…covid19 and the general marketing drive for nanotech infested, DNA modifying hyper immunity inducing depopulation jabs…

The financial collapse is planned, inevitable and in the post. The timing of the cyber polygon suggests the ‘covid like computer virus’ may arrive in September, or soon after - timed to coincide with the highly predictable autumnal surge in illness - not due to insignificantly altered ‘variants’ but injection induced pathogenic priming and nano tech interactivity with increasing levels of MMW radiation…

Its not a pretty picture, but thankfully there is still time to prepare, and plenty of worldwide resistance to the proposed new world order emerging from the chaos…

Cyber attacks will of course continue to happen after the exercise, but are you saying that the exercise is part of a greater plan that also involves an actual cyber attack orchestrated by the WEF?

1 Like

Yes. And its a grim subject. The ‘Davos Clique’ need holding to account.

I saw this video yesterday. Interesting presentation and perspective…

And here is a recent interview with Whitney Webb…always brilliant.

1hr44m30s

What exactly is it that makes you think that the WEF are planning an actual cyber attack?

1 Like

Its a matter of perception - it seems really obvious to me. The proposed cyber pandemic will further facilitate the WEF Great reset…

Can you point specifically where the WEF are proposing a cyber pandemic?

1 Like

As I said its a matter of perception. Some people may still believe that a WEF crisis simulation exercise has no bearing on the future. It seems blatantly obvious to me that these are destined to be actualized…

“…In recent decades, such events have often been preceded by simulations that come thick and fast before the very event they were meant to “prevent” takes place. Recent examples include the 2020 US election and COVID-19. One of these, Event 201, was cohosted by the World Economic Forum in October 2019 and simulated a novel coronavirus pandemic that spreads around the world and causes major disruptions to the global economy—just a few weeks before the first case of COVID-19 appeared. Cyber Polygon 2021 is merely the latest such simulation, cosponsored by the World Economic Forum. The forum’s current agenda and its past track record of hosting prophetic simulations demands that the exercise be scrutinized…”

Facts are not a matter of perception. When you write that they are proposing it, when you know they aren’t proposing it, then you are lying.


When military exercises take place, and then a war starts, do you also think that the war was part of the exercise?

When they test the fire alarm at work, and then the building burns down a while after, do you also think the fire was part of the fire alarm test?

When I play the “Pandemic” board game (big recommend btw), and then a pandemic strikes, do you also think the real pandemic was created by the creators of the board game?

I guess you would answer yes to these? Otherwise I’d be confused about what’s different between these examples and WEF’s exercise.


You write that it seems blatantly obvious to you, can you point to the biggest thing that makes you think it’s so obvious?

1 Like

As the famous Tavistockian/fabian/eugenicist Aldous Huxley said “facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored”
I’ve included a link to John Colemans now rather elderly, plagued by republican bias but otherwise factually informative book on the Tavistock institute as an introduction into the enormous web of propagandist deceit which led to the implementation of the first two world wars…

But back to the present day and world war three… In answer to whether or not I believe that you playing a board game about a pandemic created a pandemic…Im not trying to undermine your personal creative powers in any way but it actually took alot more structurally influential, Davos attending players with BSL4 laboratories, governments and institutions at their fingertips to effect a pandemic scenario as successfully as they have…

I’ll take your lack of response to my questions as that you don’t have any answers to them. If that is the case, you might want to think about why you can’t answer them, because they are simple questions that should be easy to answer.

As I already said - I consider major Wars and conflict to be entirely planned for. This is why I included a link to colemans book.
I explained the difference between a game night with a predictive programming device and the machinations of highly organised global elitists…but didn’t answer your question about a fire alarm…well - if a fire alarm goes off in a building its because its been triggered by something. Usually its a drill but occasionally its a fire. Its always a good idea to get out. Was the hypothetical fire linked to the hypothetical fire drill? Who would benefit? Was there an insurance claim?..

Here are the main questions, please point towards your answers if you already answered them, thanks.

Negative…

No worries…

Regardless of individual perspective - some preparation seems pragmatic at this stage…

Thanks!

So you think the WEF can gain from a future cyber attack, and you think that makes it blatantly obvious that they are organizing one?

The exercise is the simulated cyber attack, or are you referring to something else? I don’t see what about these statements make it obvious that the WEF are organizing a cyber attack. Please specify if you want.

What about this statement makes it blatantly obvious that the WEF are organizing a cyber attack?

No worries. A brief look through Colemans book will provide some historical instances of contrived crises… I have observed the way in which WEF ‘exercises’ proceed to manifest in reality…I think the next few months are a good time to prepare but I can see our perceptions differ - it looks like we will have to agree to disagree.

It’s fairly easy to think that way if your always looking for the bad in ppl, I used to be very similar.

Although I think it would be naive to not think some ppl / groups are only self interested with little to no regard for others.

You see what you seek, look for evils and you will find them, look for good you will find that too.

It took me a good while to stop seeing many things as plots and conspiracies, and realise if I looked with healthier vision things looked alot healthier.

2 Likes

@lukas Smedley Butler one of the US’s most decorated generals wrote a pamphlet called “War is a Racket”. In this pamphlet he explains how all of the wars he was involved in was to further corporate or banking interests.

War Is A Racket

WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

In the World War [I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted their huge blood gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows.

How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How many of them dug a trench? How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? How many of them spent sleepless, frightened nights, ducking shells and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How many of them parried a bayonet thrust of an enemy? How many of them were wounded or killed in battle?

Out of war nations acquire additional territory, if they are victorious. They just take it. This newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few – the selfsame few who wrung dollars out of blood in the war. The general public shoulders the bill.

And what is this bill?

This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones. Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Depression and all its attendant miseries. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.

During the buildup to WW2 he was enlisted by the same interests that funded Hitler to become a dictator in the US during the same time Hitler would rein in Germany. He collected as much information as possible and then turned states evidence on these people. It was called the Business Plot.

Major wars are for profit and power nothing else. Read his short pamphlet. There is nothing new under the sun.

3 Likes

I am aware that crises have been created on purpose, with that in mind one can assume that they also continue to be created. However, that does not mean that every crisis is created on purpose, or that it makes sense to assume that they are.

I’m assuming you’re referring to the WEF doing that pandemic exercise before the corona crisis, and now the cyber attack exercise.

Regarding the pandemic exercise

Epidemics and pandemics have been increasing together with the population expansion and people living closer together as well as traveling more. This is a widely known fact in the modern world, since long before Covid 19. We have had a number of “pandemic scares” in the past 20 years, we’ve just been mostly lucky until Covid 19.

I’m sure this fact is the reason the WEF had an exercise on this subject. It’s not anything out of the ordinary that this exercise was followed by a pandemic as statistically speaking they will happen.

Am I saying the WEF are not behind the pandemic? No, just like everyone else I just don’t know. But to say that they are behind it while having literally no proof doesn’t do anything good for anyone.

Regarding cyber attack exercise

I don’t think the cyber attack exercise will be followed by a cyber attack. I know that it will be followed by many cyber attacks, and they are going to be more severe than before. How can I know this? Because statistics say that’s what’s going to happen. The number and severity of cyber attacks are steadily increasing.

On the other hand, if the exercise isn’t followed by many cyber attacks… That would be weird, if that happens you should start to wonder what sort of power the WEF commands. That would be a hell of an effective exercise.

Don’t you see that you are just taking a scheduled event and tying it together with future events that are statistically guaranteed to occur?


I don’t disagree with this!

Considering cyber attacks are getting more common and severe, and pandemics are getting more common and severe, and all the other stuff that’s going on in the world today, it makes total sense to prepare yourself for what might come.

Does this then also mean that it makes sense to put the blame for the problems on some unrelated organization? Of course not, it’s highly unproductive for everyone involved.

What if you did manage to bring down the WEF? Pandemics and cyber attacks would still continue on the same trend they have been for the past 30 years, because the WEF is nothing in the face of these statistics. I guess companies might be a bit less prepared for them since the WEF wouldn’t be able to arrange exercises anymore, but that’s probably about it.


It’s good to hear from someone that has been able to get out of this irrational state. Your change bodes well for those still stuck in it.

I agree that it would be naive to not think some people and groups only care about themselves. For all I know the WEF is a group like that, I didn’t even know they existed before people here started posting about them. But what’s the point of accusing and spreading lies about some organization for something without even any evidence at all? I just don’t see the point, it seems counter productive even!

What if the WEF actually did something bad now? Many people probably wouldn’t believe it because they’ve realized anything negative anyone says about the WEF is likely just a lie. If the WEF are so evil as people say, isn’t it just GOOD for the WEF if people are desensitized to claims that the WEF are doing something bad?

I’m not expecting a response from you of course @bones, just rhetorical questions.


@Knosis can you specify what you’re responding to and what your point is?

I’m pointing out large scale wars are for profit and power. When we go to school we hear about how they had to happen. We don’t hear that WW1 and WW2, in essence the same war were to consolidate power and profits for a select few. The masses are given fairy tails about why they and their families had to go to war. The reality is that rich powerful people wanted these wars for profit. They do the same thing today.

The WEF and those behind it are not out for the good of the common man. They are openly saying the intend to reform society worldwide. They go into great detail about how this will look if you watch their videos. They are in support of limited rights and increased government powers. They are talking about a health reset, a jobs reset, and a social reset. They are an unelected group of powerful people connected to huge international companies, the IMF, and World Bank. These are the same people who’ve sat by idly as the Mid East has been bombed for profit for over 20 years. How are they to be trusted to reform society or push through a jobs reset? No common people have input or voting rights. Nobody is asking rich powerful greedy people to reset the jobs market or society. Nobody voted for this.

Bill Gates announced that in four years there would be a global pandemic. How did he know? They ran event 201 and 6 months later they have what they were practicing turning into reality. If you go through event 201 you’ll find there was no planning to save the common man’s resources or lively hood. They openly spoke about the need for greater censorship of the internet. How huge international corporations would come to the rescue in partnership with governments. What is called when corporations and governments unite? I think Mussolini had a term for it.

Even going back to 911 the feds were doing a drill the very day of the attack and happened to have all the resources on hand when their drill went live.

When they tell us before they do these things, it is called revelation of the method. In their sick world if you don’t take precautions after they’ve warned you they see that it is on you not them as they told us what was going to happen.

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”

Franklin D. Roosevelt

This quote is not from a conspiracy theorist but from a man who saw how it works up close.

3 Likes