What it means to be a Libertarian

Continuing the discussion from Austrian economics and the safe network:

This is the entire point of being libertarian. You can lean your way while I lean mine, but neither of us forces the other to lean our way. Edit: I realize I’m oversimplifying this to a great extent and not explaining about property rights and contractual agreements. But essentially as long as we agree on property rights you lean your way and I’ll lean mine. As soon as you start infringing on my property rights we have issues with you calling yourself a libertarian…

What kind of views would you like to force on me (society) that you don’t hold to the zero aggression principle?

Here is a pretty good talk on the non-aggression principle from Tom Woods and Stephan Kinsella. Stephan wrote the book Against Intellectual Property (or on Amazon).