What If Safecoin was TIMEBASED?

[luckybit]

@dyamanaka

The idea of @luckybit’s post is being practiced in a subtle way.

I just finished my 7-day Closed Beta on (EverQuestNext Landmark) and submitted a few bug reports while testing the game. Even though I was not paid in fiat money, there was a possibility we could keep our templates (blueprints of constructed buildings) that were made in-game, during the Closed Beta.

It would have been awesome if I was paid “game shares” for helping to polish the game. But like most people, we were just happy to help improve the game for free. Some were upset their templates would be wiped, so that is currently in controversy right now. The things they built were amazing!

Machines will continue to replace simple redundant labor. We should encourage the growth of a new industry where people are “paid to play”, as in the example above. I see a lot of potential for the SAFE Network App Builders.

Maybe this specific conversation should be moved to a new topic called: (App Incentives & Pay Models.)

See the reason that game companies cannot afford to make these sorts of pay players with shares incentives is because they are hierarchies, they are centralized, they aren’t anywhere near as efficient as a decentralized application. A decentralized application once written would not need to do anything except distribute shares/incentives to get users to provide content, get developers to provide code, and all of this would be algorithmic.

No need for physical offices, no need for a CEO, no need for employees, and if there are founders they could get a founders percentage. All of these cost savings can go directly to users.

Would you like to move the conversation or should I?