Some of the community members are investors, which made this project development possible in the first place. Its fair to ask about the timelines, staff, holidays etc. Some might care more than others, some might show their impatience more than others, some might ask more than others, and sometimes unconfy questions. it doesnt mean that thet dont care or want to harm the development. We all believe in this project, in the people behind it. We all want it to be as transparent as possible, last couple of months we saw many people leaving, investors do notice this and it is worrying. No one outside the organisation know if there is some second bottom for all those changes, its always better to ask, you wont get lost as long as you ask…
Hey @anon94252342 do you know what’s better than the best cow ever for the bull? A new cow… So we all have the same mechanism by which dopamine is released. The old is boring, the new is exciting.
I would argue that all the people leaving now have stayed so long precisely because the project is so important. And now they leave because they are sure the project will be completed without them. And people need a new cow even if they had the best cow in the world…
And all of the staff are now shareholders/investors. There is no shareholder/investor more important that any other and none have dominion over the other. You should not expect to be told staff holidays or when they are sick etc. it is way too much. We all have motivation to succeed. Many of us though go beyond that by a long way.
We would normally have announced Fraser leaving in the update (likely next weeks), but in any case the drive is launch.
Maybe it is a good time to push the Github Sponsor program more aggressively mentioned 1 month ago:
I don’t want to be harsh but the amount of work left before the network first release candidate is huge in terms of time/dev working hours remanining. It would be a win/win for Maidsafe to access this worldwide developers workforce market in order to avoid this kind of inconveniences about devs going in/out the project. We need to remember the development of this project it should never stop in order to upgrade capabilities, fix bugs, etc.
Agreed, perhaps this convo should be moved off to leave the OP points and answers to be not confused.
100% this is always difficult, we are pushing so quickly right now though any new hire would potentially slow us down. We are looking though. I feel the whole network running will make onboarding so much simpler.
This is an inexcusable bump and digression on top, but Pierre, who’s responsible for the Twitter redesign? Choke them, choke them, choke them, and come back, find artistic similarities with everyone, and welcome back.
And if it’s you… Same modus operandi, but without coming back
My guess would be this is at the bottom of MaidSafe’s todo list right now until they start re-working their common coin. Also you are aware that Pierre actually has another job and is not maintaining Parsec or currently involved at any level with MaidSafe development right? As for the other two they are very busy delivering on Fleming.
Like you said, the paper is undergoing peer review and it’s available on Arxiv in the meantime:
This is not in Maidsafe hands or in my hands right now. It’s in the hands of the journal and the academic reviewers.
People at Maidsafe will be notified when there is progress on this, and I’m sure they will bring it up in the forum.
Thanks! I’m curious about this ‘section’ too. In cosmos network, each zone( blockchain) has own consensus and status (who owns how many coins). When one zone is compromised due to whatever reasons( hack, software error…) then damage may spill over to other zones who interconnected with it. Is this ‘section’ has a similar problem as cosmos zone? or ‘section’ is cannot be pinpointed unlike cosmos zone? so consequently safer ?
It is difference between an attack as double spent or disturb by spamming.
There is very hard to have more than 1/3 of elders in one section under own control, while not having 1/3 of all elders in whole network, but If someone will have it, he can control the network. The probability is bigger at the start of the SAFEnetwork than anytime later.
If section is only disturbed by spam attack, there could be time-outs, lags etc, but no serious damage.
If you are going to load page and one chunk comes from disturbed section, it will probably takes longer. Some future tests will show.