I disagree with the whole notion of inexplicable change. @dallyshalla raised money to create a decentralized exchange. His investors want him to release a product and he has reputation to lose. Beside that: he didn´t raise a lot of money, allowing him to endlessly delay development. So what is he going to do? Sit and wait? I agree that some of his recent post show frustration over the development process of the network, but on the other hand Daniel never ruled out to release Safex on the SAFE network. As long as there is no real clue how Safecoin will become implemented, I understand there is a problem to stay focussed on the network.
Always wonder how people can pour money into high risk projects and then acting as if it was the most surprising in the world when those projects take different routes. Maidsafe did when switching over to Rust and still you have a growing community of people seeing the potential. Should we see another conspiracy here?
I agree more transparency is always good, but this to me looks like conspiracy theory over transparency…
Anyway, why not having a thread about this. Look at the topics created by Warren and others in Off-topic. There is certainly a adequate category for this issue.