The logo isn´t centralised. It´s really the way you look at it. It could also me the segment of a larger pattern
More importantly: I think people need to stop wasting time in interpreting and philosophising. Logos don´t work like that and they are not supposed to do what you think they should do: it´s not the task of a logo to denotate or resemble a specific message. Association is way more important. You could take literally every famous brand and question it this way. Vagueness implies the possibility of contradictions, but it rather drives the brand than making it unusable as this discussion somewhat suggests.
This logo can be developed and embedded in the larger narrative of SAFE, it can also be questioned, but I don´t really see the point of the latter, since there are good reasons for sticking to it. With every design some people won´t be satisfied - that´s life. Also, people need to consider that this is mostly a taste-discussion, for the larger part of the community has no professional design expertise.
Just my 50 SAFEcents