Sorry, I have no idea what safex is. Just brainstorming.
Added:
Just found this in the other thread, thought it was pertinent here:
When does a breaking point occur where too many coins have been lost. Consider a constant loss of 1% to 2% per year. The only way to handle the deflation is to spawn off a more abundant currency and use the older more valuable one as collateral. Which is essentially what the main alt-coins are. Central banks hold gold but issue paper. Deflation can be just as bad as inflation. But as it has been stated, isn’t the whole point of safecoin to run the network, not be a main store of value, just like cash is not a store of value. The really interesting part of the composting scenario is that it still could be a store of value for a user if managed right, ie. not letting it go stale and be recycled, while also acting as an non-dwindling reservoir for fueling the network.
Furthermore, one can also take the perspective that “once a coin is lost, it is lost forever,” as nothing more than “blockchain bias”. Also, bitcoin doesn’t natively work with bitcoins, it works with satoshis, giving it the equivalent of 2,100,000,000,000,000 currency units approximately equivalent to a straight up 2^51 safecoin address space under the case of naive divisibility, which you don’t like for various reasons that we’ve considered in the divisibility thread.