You say you believe it can be done, with little detail as to the mechanism, and no explanation if how to overcome some obvious problems.
I immediately recognise problems with this approach and explain one, giving you the opportunity to look more deeply at the obvious flaws in the idea. I also suggested a way this might be overcome by the way.
I can see more such problems, even if the the initial malware objection could be overcome using zkSNARK. But you have said you don’t want this kind of constructive critique. That’s not creative or constructive IMO.
Moderator comment
The above was my personal response, the following is as moderator. I don’t have time to clean up this thread today, so I am just going to comment.
As a result of @Tonda’s objection to the nature of the responses from several members, and the resulting back and forth, we have yet another thread bulging with off topic asides, and calls for the mods to impose order and filter the chaff.
We mods are volunteers who put a lot of time into this, mostly unseen, and can’t police or guide or tidy up, every discussion. Not least because moderator intervention often creates just as much flack and push back from a spirited community suspicious of authority and commited to freedom of speech. Damned if we do and damned if we don’t.
So it is also up to the community to learn from this.
@Tonda, you are new here but you are already telling longstanding members how to discuss things. It’s a credit to the community that the responses have remained measured, civil and largely objective, because I think you need to learn more about this community and find a way of expressing your wants without inviting people of topic, or telling people what is and is not OK here.
Let’s all do better
All of us can do better in this respect, definitely me included, so I’m not preaching. (Actually I have learned from the recent cafuffle and discussions with many concerned, and have mods and members to thank for finding ways forward here.)
If you value healthy on topic discussion, or wish to pursue new lines of thought, don’t deviate from the OP on the thread of the OP. And don’t invite others to do so either by including niggles about others, personal slights, condescension etc. (No accusations there, just examples of things that can trigger people to go off topic).
Instead: stay with the OP, or reply by PM or with a new topic.
If you wish to respond to this moderation, please reply to a new topic in the meta category and we can contribute to building the best community forum from everyone’s ideas, experience and good will.