SAFE Network - Test 16

safe://pacman.wrn/ :video_game:

5 Likes

safe://rust.scotcoin/

7 Likes

In.

1 Like

SIIIIIIIICK will test tonight!

3 Likes

:raised_hand: Node 1f2df8 reporting for duty in sector 000.
I’ve increased my vault size by 10 and setup a custom storage folder:

“max_capacity”: 53687091200,
“chunk_store_root”: “E:/maidsafe”,

I intend to keep the vault up without restarts for the following two weeks :relaxed:

9 Likes

safe://galaxy

There are currently 126 nodes:

18 Likes

I am trying to run a vault, but it closes down as soon as it gets connected (I think, I am not able to read what it says before it closes down). I have UPnP enabled in the router (not sure if there is some other setting i need to apply since I don’t know much about routing). My upload bandwidth is measured to be at least 20 Mbit/s, so that should be ok.

Any ideas on how to make it work?

1 Like

SAFE-FS Apps uploaded to TEST 16:

safe://demo.wom → website publisher
safe://chat.wom → encrypted chat
safe://tube.wom → SAFE YouTube
safe://zero.wom → APP ZERO tutorial
safe://dir.wom2 → Website directory
safe://time.wom2 → MaidSafe Timeline

5 Likes

Seems very slow
safe://rust.scotcoin
safe://tube.wom
safe://dir.wom

all fail to load completely.
no graphic loaded in rust.scotcoin, Will’s sites just give me a pretty bkgd and a spinning arrow…

Also when I tried to fire p anther vault I got
ubuntu@ip-172-31-21-112:~/safe_vault-v0.14.0-linux-x64$ ./safe_vault
I 17-04-07 00:26:36.098246

Running safe_vault v0.14.0
==========================
I 17-04-07 00:26:39.187933 Node(6c4849..()) Requesting a relocated name from the network. This can take a while.
I 17-04-07 00:26:39.459179 Node(b742b8..()) Received relocated name. Establishing connections to 18 peers.
I 17-04-07 00:26:39.576959 Node(b742b8..()) Starting approval process to test this node's resources. This will take at least 300 seconds.
I 17-04-07 00:27:09.459351 Node(b742b8..()) 17/18 resource proof response(s) complete, 99% of data sent. 380/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:27:39.459542 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 350/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:28:09.459734 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 320/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:28:39.459919 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 290/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:29:09.460128 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 260/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:29:39.460333 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 230/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:30:09.460562 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 200/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:30:39.460753 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 170/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:31:09.461001 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 140/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:31:39.461195 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 110/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:32:09.461393 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 80/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:32:39.461625 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 50/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:33:09.461844 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent. 20/410 seconds remaining.
I 17-04-07 00:33:29.459343 Node(b742b8..()) All 18 resource proof responses fully sent, but timed out waiting for approval from the network. This could be due to the target section experiencing churn. Terminating node.

And to add to the tale of woe…

2 Likes

I got my invitation token, but it was rejected. Is there a time limit on its validity? I went to dinner about 10 minutes after requesting the token (but before receiving it) so it was over an hour before I got around to trying to use it. Thanks in advance for any help.

Yup. Confirmed. It is slow. It is taking forever to login. I finally able to log in after the 4th try.

Not able to load any of the sites, besides the wingman video.

1 Like

I’m sending you a PM on this.

2 Likes

Run it from terminal, then if it exits you can at least see what it said before exiting. Or check log files

1 Like

What could be causing the speed issues?? The tunneling changes?

1 Like

[code]T 17-04-07 00:52:10.520822 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 1860f0… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.520861 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 18b220… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.520899 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 199587… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.520940 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 1f2df8… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.520978 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 1f4822… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521019 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 1f74d7… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521061 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 42b819… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521099 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 45373a… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521138 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 46170d… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521179 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 4891a4… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521218 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 4dc10a… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521257 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 4ea5e3… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521296 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 510b66… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521334 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 5431d4… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521372 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 58e19c… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521410 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 5a4969… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521449 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 5ae44d… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521487 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 5b5395… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521531 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 5b97c0… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
T 17-04-07 00:52:10.521570 [routing::states::node node.rs:509] Node(47db02…(010)) Asking 5ea309… to serve as a tunnel for PeerId(a78ae574…).
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.524072 [routing::states::node node.rs:2008] Node(47db02…(010)) Adding PeerId(ebabfb78…) as a tunnel node for PeerId(a78ae574…).
I 17-04-07 00:52:10.524827 [routing::states::node node.rs:283] Node(47db02…(010)) - Indirect connections: 1, tunnelling for: 0
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.525617 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(2439d4bd…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.525689 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(9826c86a…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.525749 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(6a2b17f0…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.525802 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(a4b72a91…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.525891 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(65cd2c3a…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.525948 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(4386909f…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.526000 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(32b4e244…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.526714 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(350f8c80…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.533273 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(ff543776…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.533410 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(f0cab0e4…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.534260 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(77c9eeca…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.534362 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(3f2fa41d…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.534421 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(946431ee…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.534495 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(c9609f6f…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.534559 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(f90e5bd4…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)
D 17-04-07 00:52:10.534612 [routing::states::node node.rs:2014] Node(47db02…(010)) Received TunnelSuccess from PeerId(a78b05b3…) for an already connected peer PeerId(a78ae574…)

[/code]

Vault running smoothly here in Switzerland.

4 Likes

The safe:// sites all work for me, although they might be a bit slower than usual. I’m having problems with my AWS Ubuntu instance vault though with the Failed to establish Bootstrap (FailedExternalReachability) error.

I have inbound rules set to SSH TCP Port 22 open to my IP, and port 5483 open to all.

1 Like

Cannot logging to my account…

EDITED :

okay, I also get timeouts when trying to load safe sites. safe://galaxy

{“errorCode”:-37,“description”:“CoreError::RequestTimeout”}

Other safe sites load fine, maybe a bit slow

2 Likes

OK, running a vault on Test 16 …

And a webpage:

safe://whynot.allofme/

Most of the other pages load but for safe://galaxy: RequestTimeout

2 Likes