I can so relate to that since i work in a construction company
One major difference is the building has a completion and handover date. Not having that with the network makes us read and have our own interpretations. The building analogy is great. Love it.
Yes the analogy does work, but maybe it works better if looking at a new type of building that has new groundbreaking features that have never been done previously.
Some say software is never finished, only released (or abandoned).
Concerning the Sagrada FamĂlia: already consecrated (~=released) by the Pope and masses are taking place. Ps: such construction time periods were normal in the middle ages.
Quick question on Parsec. Are there any major known problems that there is no solution to at the moment? Or generally speaking, parsec does what is needed, it just needs to be quicker/optimised?
@fergish Iâm saving up to donate to you () and your trusty musician for the next episode. Really love this 1 with dirvine and viv, I listened twice, gonna listen a third time because there is always hiding s inside there.
Some layman questions: Will this mean that indices must be maintained to access the six different RDF triple patterns for each entry[1] and time-space trade off will that bring? Query complexity[2] vs say a native Triple store or graphDB[3]? Is a native RDF triple store (or Graph database[4]) overlay feasible for the Safe Network?
I found some other interesting related topics questioning how RDF and storage/query methods could be simplified for developers while doing a quick background research on this question, have posted to a new topic here.