No, there are several documents and they are internal conversations. Should be accurate and some point out deficiencies we think exist in other projects, given where they are in dev/release. We don’t want to make it a public thing to be publicly critical of others as we do wish to collaborate with projects as we move along. Where we find neat things then I am sure the Engineers will talk about those publicly, but these are Engineering opinions, internal to the team. We want the teams to be able to discuss privately these kinds of things and not have them opened up. It is just due to the economic impact it may have on some projects where it could seem like us being critical of them unfairly due to them not being involved.
Interesting idea mind you, but as they stand I think the Engineers would not be happy to make them public. Perhaps later we can create pro/con type lists of other projects as we see them. I would love such a list to be somewhere like wikipedia where projects can prove they do not have some cons or can add some pros etc.