I have to say, I don’t think anyone is tied to PNS as the naming system name. But no alternative really stood out in that discussion (at least as I saw… there were many many ideas, but none really stood out / got folks behind them), so for now, we’re just rolling with RFC naming.
That’s still open to change though, so if folks are really feeling strong about it, I’d suggest hitting up the RFC. If we can get to a decent shortlist that’d already be a good step forwards.
@happybeing I’d agree with @bochaco. In general, we’re looking at developing a simpler API layer above the ‘low level’ stuff we’ve had. But if we’ve a files API working w/ RDF, and then align the current NFS api with this (to work with RDF as the underlying data store), I’m not sure how worthwhile having them both will be.