What on Earth are you on about?[quote=“polpolrene, post:57, topic:6049”]
And @Melvin answered your question:
[/quote]
He said something in response to it, but certainly didn’t give an answer to the question. Is this the clear answer bit, that I missed off apparently for nefarious reasons:
I asked for clarity on this 3 times to no avail - if I don’t understand it and no clarification is given, then how on Earth can it constitute an answer to anything - nevrmind the question?[quote=“polpolrene, post:57, topic:6049”]
And you indeed quoted just a little part of his reply which isn’t a very nice way of having a debate IMO
[/quote]
Nice unsubstantiated opinion piece - so rather than quote salient points that I understand, I should quote everything, always? If it’s “not nice” in what way is it not nice and what exactly am I being suspected of here - why don’t you accept my claims that there was no intent to do anything?[quote=“polpolrene, post:57, topic:6049”]
Next to that you quoted your question and his answer in the wrong order
[/quote]
Again, wtf you on about?[quote=“polpolrene, post:57, topic:6049”]
I’m not surprised that some folks here don’t want have a debate with you.
[/quote]
Neither am I - it’s only mods on here…
Edit:
Ah……I get it – you’re suggesting I omitted the “answer” part – well, no I didn’t as I didn’t recognise it as an answer, nor did I understand it. None of it was an answer to my questions in any case. I basically asked 2 questions –
“Any ideas on how to further democratise modding recruitment?”
Apparent answer:
“I only want to say that I’m satisfied with the way we’re adding new moderators to the team right now”
which appears to be an answer to something like:
“How well do you think the current system of mod recruitment is working?”
And, the other thing I asked was basically:
“Are you in agreement with Happybeing that the present un-elected system is the optimum model in democratic/accountability terms.
Answer:
“It are the current mods that need to work with the new mods and that’s why I don’t think it’s a good idea to decentralize the ‘election’ of new moderators towards all 1700 community members.”
As I said I don’t understand this and suspect that even if I did, it would be an answer to something like:
“What would be your argument for not de-centralising/democratising the recruitment process?”
As I correctly said the answers did not address the questions…conclusion imo - Evaded
2nd Edit:
Lol……just “got” the meaning of the “answer£”. The old mods are the ones that have to work with the new mods, so they should choose them……brilliant argument….
It’s like asking:
“Should the individual members of society choose it’s own politicians”
Answer:
No!.. I’m the Queen and I have to work with them, so I’ll choose ‘em……brilliant…… as I said.