Does that then mean that whatever group used to get 100% of generated coins, with this approach gets less?
If that’s the case then no wonder they’d object.
That’s in line with my objections to changing the original compact (I’m against any changes unless they’re agreed to by all, which could be done by blockchain voting), meaning if whenever there’s a change that makes any party gets less than based on the “prospectus” from before the crowd-sale, there should be a vote.
But for the sake of argument, why shouldn’t users simply pay? What is the weakness of that approach compared to this proposal?