Quick @Josh call it for tomorrow
PITTA . . .
It’s just a Liverpudlian thing, or is Mancunian?
Not sure thers is a big difference
Careful or you will be a candidate for either a good kicking or remedial spelling lessons
Probably both.
NAT issues have caused so many bloody noses over the years for SAFE. Part of me wants to just bale on the whole thing and force node operators to learn how to forward a bloody port, just like so many other projects do. This would mean some sort of onboarding script that picks a random number, writes it into the config file, and then tells the user to open that port in their router, so we could still have unpredictable ports.
or use ipv6? just learned it doesnt have NAT
I’m still scared of IPV6. I now always disable it in my routers, after reading how so many devices have IPV6 vulnerabilities. I have a lot of random junk on my network, and don’t want to worry about what vulnerability each thing has.
Yikes! How big an issue is it?
But sounds like everything else is on track. Team flying high keep it going
Coming from you I’ll take that as a compliment
What are IPV6 vulnerabilities, can you explain in short why?
So tired of the IPV4 shortage of addresses an IP’s CGNAT.
My money is still on next week. And next week, I may have to cover that with money on the week after. But coming soon
The smartest person I knew in college couldn’t spell worth a lik.
@Traktion Is saying that these people while reading skip over spelling mistakes because their minds fix the errors before consciously seeing them
Yes, but often the mistakes are made in haste, but then difficult to spot when you read it back (as your mind fixes them). I’m always editing my posts after I submit them and then spot a typo or some such. Spotting bad uses of the right sounding, but wrong spelling, of a word is even harder. To me at least anyway!
here here, these are teh difficult wons to spot
Reluctantly dragging this back on topic - who would prefer a testnet today even if we have to manually configure ports?
With the proviso that work on the IGD issue continues in the expectation of a fix sometime next week.
Which is why proofreaders were in high demand prior to wordprocessing spell checkers, but really still should be considering the poor quality of some papers.