Polls should not be prefixed with a bias… and mind you don’t make statements you don’t have evidence for.
Certainly Poloniex fell down, both in their judgement and customer service responses, likely on the back of sucking new owners who cared for a quick profit and not doing good by their customer base.
Still, the question is
Once there is a tool for claiming SafeCoin, should it be forked for adding in politics.
I think that’s a slippery error… where do you stop, and whose judgement calls the shots.
The tool is not a route to resolve such problems and creating bias in the tool could be a liability.
Also, I don’t see the point - if MaidSafe rightly do a tool that does the fuction, then forking it still sees that tool available.
If the proposal is some kind of alt safecoin I can’t see how that would work.
tldr; Poloniex would always have MaidSafe’s tool to use.
A poll on whether Poloniex sucks would be simpler.