In good faith, I am for the moment going to presume that this is not being done by high ranking community members here and that this is merely being done by those who would seek to abuse the system. If lower ranking members have the access to be able to flag posts, I would suggest that the ability to flag posts only be granted to the highest ranking community members here.
I created a post for an idea called WebPARSEC that was inspired by both SAFE-VFS and WebTorrent technologies. Of the few links that I used, I ONLY linked to external sites that provided specific frame of reference to provide clarity about exactly what it is that I am trying to suggest as a new SafeNet Technology.
Suddenly, the system is telling me that several community members had flagged my post and subsequent responses to other people on that post, as spam. Then my entire account was momentarily on lockdown. Though the lockdown has been lifted, my post as a whole is still flagged as spam, effectively censoring my ability to propose and discuss the idea. I am afraid to even link to that post, for fear that the exact same thing might happen to this post. I would like for an administrator to look for my post based on the data I’ve provided here, and to unflag it as spam.
I am going to assume that this was done to me by fake accounts that are looking to exploit vulnerabilities in the forum system in order to hinder communications between members and sabotage collaboration within this project, by those who might view SafeNet as a direct threat to their own competing technologies.
If however this was done by genuine members who merely disliked or disagreed with my idea, then I would like to suggest to them that censoring me does not show me nor anyone else why you dislike or disagree with the idea. In order for people to learn and understand more, I would advise that instead of censoring people – to post a response explaining why you dislike or disagree with an idea, or why you feel that a particular reference link is not relevant to the discussion.
New ideas for SafeNet are not meant to compete with each other in popularity contests, they are all equally valid points of discussion towards the mutual effort of the creative improvement of the SafeNet platform.
Thank you all in advance.