Meshnets on Maidsafe


#102

That kind of caching could work for static content, but it would seem to me that standard software (like Squid) would provide these features better for dynamic content. For something “in between”, like RSS feeds, either may be good.


#103

Hee this is fun

These guys even know about Maidsafe

http://www.daowisp.io/Contribute/contribute.html


#104

#105

Take pcell type tech and get rid of its back haul. Use LiFI on cars and outside lamps and direct line of sight optical.


#106

Why couldn’t we use LiFi to create an orbital uplink mesh? Stick a couple LiFi relays on some mountaintops or something to minimize cloudcover issues then shine all the way up into space and back down again. Probably wouldn’t be perfect but it would probably help and should be a damn sight faster than transmitting radio waves given light moves faster than radio.


#107

There was a project that attempted to set up full bitcoin nodes in low earth orbit satellites.
It was called BitSat, lead by Jeff Garzik.
The project has been cancelled, but they did take some serious consideration to implement the idea.

The thing is to maintain these constellations it should have a viable business model, these nanosatellites in LEO could last about 1 to 3 yrs (several factors can shorten or lengthen its operational lifetime).

Regarding to using lasers in satellites for communication, there are several proposals, this is one of them:

PS: Considering that the SafeNetwork is quite unique in its incentive model with several potential revenue streams, there MAY be a way of supporting our own satellite network and getting the network pay itself its costs. Running a bitcoin node in space is quite limited businesswise compared to running a SafeCoin farmer in space 24/7…


#108

Just throwing this idea out there but what if, once you had satelites up there, you got them to self replicate and spread. It’s not like there’s a lack of space junk up there to feed on or anything and there’s plenty of solar energy. This would a) allow them to farm for safecoin passively. b) Serve humanity as a whole by feeding on space junk. c) Spread the SAFE network further out and around the planet creating a wider mesh net. d) Over the long term you could have such nodes build an information bridge to Luna or over the REALLY long term perhaps even to neighboring planets like Venus or Mars, or into the asteroid belt. Of course new sources for materials would be needed but there are asteroids, comets, Luna, whatever else.


#109

Radio waves travel at the speed of light.


#110

Having a space fab is something that will happen, but it is still far away.
One of the main objectives of Deep Space Industries is not to just mine asteroids but to build factories in space.

Processing raw materials and having self-replicating satellites would be the next logical step. It would be way cheaper to have satellites deployed from space than to keep rocketing to orbit.

That’s decades away though.


#111

#112

I look forward to seeing mesh tech installed in factory cars to allow people to use cars as a cell tower. Mesh is comming to cell phones someday.


#113

Could this make peer to peer mesh networking become widespread adoption in certain cases?


#114

Out of interest, how did you find out about deep space industries, and that project?


#115

:stuck_out_tongue:


#116

Hey great minds think alike! Here’s a post I made about my concepts for how this could work.


#117

#118

Inter mesh link. Very cool and I think super important. Mesh of meshes.


#119

The internet is a network of autonomous networks which the main Safe instance operates over, and I’d like to better comprehend how Safe itself does or does not follow that model.

Safe-in-space would presumably require latency tolerance with techniques like store-and-forward. Mesh/community networks, like local networks, don’t necessarily need [persistent] internet connectivity. Would those Safe-in-space and Safe-mesh networks be extensions of the main Safe instance, would they be separate instances that would refuse to link with the main instance, even if/when internet connectivity was available, or perhaps independent yet linkable? Would the eventual consistency work going on now be benefited if challenged with those scenarios, specifically of abnormal latency and non-persistent connectivity?

The video you linked is no longer available so I wasn’t able to watch it. Please pardon me if my question has been answered elsewhere, and if so, I would appreciate a link. If my questions are confusing please don’t hesitate to ask for clarification.


#120

I’ve continued my crusade for a decentralized ISP. Follow the links in this chain and you can see what I’ve been up to.

A new token (New kind of network) is looking to pay people for routing internet traffic. I roasted them for creating their own token instead of using an established currency as payment. I strongly believe that using tokens as stocks is a better business model than using them as currency. I also encouraged them to cooperate with GoTenna Mesh which is a peice of hardware dedicated for this decentralized ISP piece.

Speaking of GoTenna Mesh, they have shown to be able to make bitcoin transactions over their hardware. They currently serve as the only decentralized ISP hardware device with no independant blockchain project so any project wishing to work with them is free game.


#121

So, you bash on the Safe Network, then post here about it, that seems kinda odd!
Like Why??