Only to the extent that they are direct substitutes. The thing is, Filecoin and Safe aren’t direct substitutes. Technically, Safe has no direct competitor, but would rather make redundant or greatly improve the vast majority of DLT/crypto projects.
Add to that the potential for:
At the end of the day, so long as the Safe Network delivers on a host of effectively marketed capabilities, I don’t think being (perceived as) a “second” mover in data storage is an issue.