MaidSafeCoin (MAID) - Price & Trading topic


#4099

Let’s give FB credit where it’s due. They were ahead of their time and too quick on this one.


#4100

If FB tried Blockchain currency it would drastically contrast the SAFE Net, pointing out that SAFE Net is a real alternative platform for those sick and tired of the FB scam. And then: watch SAFE Net grow!


#4101

Are you freaking kidding me, as if it’s not corrupted now.


#4102

4 posts were merged into an existing topic: Everybody needs to understand the breadth, scope, and insidious nature of centralized control.


#4103

New tax regulations cause problems for the Puerto Rico pitch. What’s 'ole Simone trying to huck at us now with this new fear porn?


#4104

Did I get it right that there will be needed 1 whole Safecoin in order to open an account? If the answer is yes, could this be the symbolic break to the adoption?


#4105

Hmhmm - there will be the need for someone paying for the account data probably - but maybe there will be an option to invite people and pay for their account…? :thinking:


#4106

If a safe coin gets to $100 , how many people will an average monthly salary allow an average person to invite?


#4107

if you only need to pay for the storage space for the account itself i guess there might be some people willing to pay the 0.00001 safecoin for the account creation of a friend (or maybe even only the guy i met in a bar)

ps: okay - of course an account with zero funding isn’t of too much use … but it might be enough to have a receiver-address for buying additional funds on some exchange / load the account through in-app-payments of my android app allowing that …


#4108

Absolutely - if its that cheap yes, I will be paying for people. lubinew is worried that it will cost 1 whole safecoin though.


#4109

i saw that - but i don’t see where that number comes from (assuming divisibility will be enabled with launch) …

edit: maybe it would be difficult to implement a new account creation just for itself with a fraction of a coin … but with someone “vouching for you” that might not be necessary … but of course a shot in the blue … because safecoin isn’t implemented yet


#4110

I would be only afraid if there was said “1 safecoin = 1 account (Full of upload power)”. Then I assume we could see the price skyrocketing ($200) but not many new users. The “entrance fee” should be rather defined as 50GB or something.


#4111

If someone has to “vouch” for you to get new users to join the party, Safe Network is dead before it is alive.


#4112

hmhmmm - right - thats why googlemail died before it had a chance to really get the feet of the ground :open_mouth: … that invitation-only thing was clearly a mistake :thinking:


#4113

Gmail’s beta started with invitation only, just like many projects in beta state (including this one to some degree) but I don’t think Google actually did. Correct me if I’m wrong. By the time SafeCoin arrives this project will be out of beta state.


#4114

don’t know how long they did it - i just thought that this invite-thing made people want to be part of it and created some buzz around those early google accounts … anyway - attaching a certain value to an account doesn’t need to be a bad thing imo … and i just suggested the vouching-thing as an alternative to force everyone to get some coin through an exchange to be able to create an account …


#4115

Not good, though, to place unnecessary impediments in the way of mass adoption.


#4116

Agreed, it needs to be cheap and easy (click and go) for everyone


#4117

i just suggested another option for paying for the storage :roll_eyes: anyway - like my thought or not - your choice … i’m not the one to decide anyway :wink:

…nobody ever suggested to place “unnecessary impediments” afaik…


#4118

Exactly. Any impediment placed is necessary to prevent spamming the network. Just because an impediment exists does not mean it’s unnecessary.