MaidSafe Dev Update 14th June 2016 - TEST 4 - Now Complete

#182

one vault on two seperate machines, both running flawless. will add a few more machines today. Nice job MaidSafe. Network running perfect, then launcher, then APPS…okay, that works for me.

2 Likes

#183

Different iterations and releases of vaults and launchers and other components put emphasis on different things and subcomponents or different implementations. The testnets and everything you see is not be regarded as a simple state of the network or a simple expression of the current situation. Everything is highly intervoven and depending on each other. But main aspec is that they are testing different areas and components of the software. Its not a monolithic block that becomes better per definition by each and every release. The comonents need to interact and there is a lot of parameters to be tuned and empirically to be tested. And especially real world deployment. Which these testnets are also probably just a very simple and basic aproach so far and later on with more and more participants we will see the real fun and if parameters hold what they sought. Keep calm and god save the queen :). Cheers.

1 Like

#184

4 nodes running on a server =) badäääm :smiley: that should help latency more than one on my laptop via wifi xD

1 Like

#185

Did we just have another big disconnect? The vault on my laptop which has been working flawlessly all day despite being moved through at least 3 diferent wi-fi APs has gone from a routing table of 78 to 2 and then back up to 66.

0 Likes

#186

still running for me. I’m currently on 86.

0 Likes

#187

Seems to have picked up since this morning which is encouraging.

http://explore.yvette.safenet
=>
http://tutorials.c4se.safenet
http://ko.udhr.safenet
http://maze.safenet
http://upstate.safenet
http://5mb.safenet
http://zh.udhr.safenet
http://el.udhr.safenet
http://ian.safenet
http://hello.safenet
http://web.chunky101.safenet
http://ar.udhr.safenet
http://se.udhr.safenet
http://gugl.safenet
http://polpolrene.safenet
http://ru.udhr.safenet
http://en.udhr.safenet
http://quake3v2.perico.safenet
http://fr.udhr.safenet
http://eye.eye.safenet
http://yvette.safenet

3 Likes

Forum Update: 2600 members, new Price & Trading topic
#188

Long while ago, I had some issue with the laptop tripping from ethernet onto wireless and not falling back and the vault seemed to stall. I didn’t take time to look into that but half thought was it was getting confused and losing it’s baring - as the wireless has different local ip address, I don’t know if that affects the external perception of the vault.

0 Likes

#189

After running an hour or three, here is the last several minutes.

INFO 12:21:23.555346627 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(0d396e..) PeerId(6be6..) - Routing Table size: 130 |
INFO 12:21:23.555354059 [routing::core core.rs:414]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:53.911560464 [routing::core core.rs:1243] Node(0d396e..) Dropped 8def7e.. from the routing table.
INFO 12:21:53.911613079 [routing::core core.rs:411]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:53.911622237 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(0d396e..) PeerId(6be6..) - Routing Table size: 129 |
INFO 12:21:53.911629882 [routing::core core.rs:414]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:53.959057687 [routing::core core.rs:1243] Node(0d396e..) Dropped 0fecaf.. from the routing table.
INFO 12:21:53.959114351 [routing::core core.rs:411]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:53.959121559 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(0d396e..) PeerId(6be6..) - Routing Table size: 128 |
INFO 12:21:53.959128791 [routing::core core.rs:414]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:54.352385705 [routing::core core.rs:1243] Node(0d396e..) Dropped 09ebdb.. from the routing table.
INFO 12:21:54.352436190 [routing::core core.rs:411]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:54.352445892 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(0d396e..) PeerId(6be6..) - Routing Table size: 127 |
INFO 12:21:54.352453079 [routing::core core.rs:414]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:54.411897009 [routing::core core.rs:1243] Node(0d396e..) Dropped 1df7ce.. from the routing table.
INFO 12:21:54.411952949 [routing::core core.rs:411]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:54.411960157 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(0d396e..) PeerId(6be6..) - Routing Table size: 126 |
INFO 12:21:54.411967304 [routing::core core.rs:414]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:56.261482779 [routing::core core.rs:1371] Node(0d396e..) Added 0df05e.. to routing table.
INFO 12:21:56.261545983 [routing::core core.rs:411]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:56.261555129 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(0d396e..) PeerId(6be6..) - Routing Table size: 127 |
INFO 12:21:56.261562897 [routing::core core.rs:414]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:21:56.262838997 [safe_vault::personas::data_manager data_manager.rs:616] Stats : Client Get requests received 21 ; Data stored - ID 5 - SD 2 - total 2209770 bytes
INFO 12:22:21.150759428 [routing::stats stats.rs:151] Stats - Sent 11000 messages in total, comprising 24248076 bytes, 17 uncategorised, routes/failed: [5571, 127, 125, 124, 124, 124, 124, 124]/124
INFO 12:22:21.150789819 [routing::stats stats.rs:158] Stats - Direct - NodeIdentify: 136, NewNode: 1421, ConnectionUnneeded: 209
INFO 12:22:21.150797477 [routing::stats stats.rs:162] Stats - Hops (Request/Response) - GetNodeName: 9/8, ExpectCloseNode: 25, GetCloseGroup: 1309/1862, ConnectionInfo: 733, Ack: 4460, GroupMessageHash: 541
INFO 12:22:21.150807204 [routing::stats stats.rs:172] Stats - User (Request/Success/Failure) - Get: 36/21/15, Put: 1/1/0, Post: 1/1/0, Delete: 0/0/0, GetAccountInfo: 0/0/0, Refresh: 194
INFO 12:31:45.799507933 [safe_vault::personas::data_manager data_manager.rs:372] Stats : Client Get requests received 21 ; Data stored - ID 6 - SD 2 - total 2220295 bytes
INFO 12:34:24.870532499 [routing::stats stats.rs:151] Stats - Sent 11500 messages in total, comprising 24635094 bytes, 17 uncategorised, routes/failed: [5937, 127, 125, 124, 124, 124, 124, 124]/124
INFO 12:34:24.870567960 [routing::stats stats.rs:158] Stats - Direct - NodeIdentify: 136, NewNode: 1421, ConnectionUnneeded: 209
INFO 12:34:24.870577266 [routing::stats stats.rs:162] Stats - Hops (Request/Response) - GetNodeName: 9/8, ExpectCloseNode: 25, GetCloseGroup: 1456/1978, ConnectionInfo: 734, Ack: 4685, GroupMessageHash: 541
INFO 12:34:24.870586194 [routing::stats stats.rs:172] Stats - User (Request/Success/Failure) - Get: 36/21/15, Put: 2/2/0, Post: 1/1/0, Delete: 0/0/0, GetAccountInfo: 0/0/0, Refresh: 203
INFO 12:36:45.070463191 [routing::core core.rs:1371] Node(0d396e..) Added 0f3ffc.. to routing table.
INFO 12:36:45.070523236 [routing::core core.rs:411]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:36:45.070532081 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(0d396e..) PeerId(6be6..) - Routing Table size: 128 |
INFO 12:36:45.070539578 [routing::core core.rs:414]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:37:50.077431527 [routing::core core.rs:1371] Node(0d396e..) Added 09b0aa.. to routing table.
INFO 12:37:50.077475585 [routing::core core.rs:411]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 12:37:50.077485017 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(0d396e..) PeerId(6be6..) - Routing Table size: 129 |
INFO 12:37:50.077493218 [routing::core core.rs:414]  ---------------------------------------------------------
0 Likes

#190
INFO 19:46:06.108217525 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(c02790..) PeerId(da1a..) - Routing Table size: 116 |
INFO 19:46:06.108251061 [routing::core core.rs:414]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 19:47:12.794134991 [safe_vault::personas::data_manager data_manager.rs:308] Stats : Client Get requests received 187 ; Data stored - ID 5 - SD 5 - total 4376140 bytes
INFO 19:47:17.703257943 [safe_vault::personas::data_manager data_manager.rs:308] Stats : Client Get requests received 188 ; Data stored - ID 5 - SD 5 - total 4376140 bytes
INFO 19:47:40.295358964 [routing::core core.rs:1371] Node(c02790..) Added c5252b.. to routing table.
INFO 19:47:40.295755917 [routing::core core.rs:411]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 19:47:40.295927108 [routing::core core.rs:413] | Node(c02790..) PeerId(da1a..) - Routing Table size: 117 |
INFO 19:47:40.296078809 [routing::core core.rs:414]  --------------------------------------------------------- 
INFO 19:51:13.416866969 [safe_vault::personas::data_manager data_manager.rs:372] Stats : Client Get requests received 188 ; Data stored - ID 6 - SD 5 - total 4376619 bytes
INFO 19:51:57.369583421 [safe_vault::personas::data_manager data_manager.rs:308] Stats : Client Get requests received 189 ; Data stored - ID 6 - SD 5 - total 4376619 bytes
INFO 19:52:06.141357958 [routing::stats stats.rs:151] Stats - Sent 43000 messages in total, comprising 37839288 bytes, 627 uncategorised, routes/failed: [26968, 154, 61, 66, 45, 35, 23, 32]/22
INFO 19:52:06.141429115 [routing::stats stats.rs:158] Stats - Direct - NodeIdentify: 240, NewNode: 751, ConnectionUnneeded: 284
INFO 19:52:06.141452659 [routing::stats stats.rs:162] Stats - Hops (Request/Response) - GetNodeName: 31/62, ExpectCloseNode: 451, GetCloseGroup: 7557/9013, ConnectionInfo: 2101, Ack: 20023, GroupMessageHash: 639
INFO 19:52:06.141474580 [routing::stats stats.rs:172] Stats - User (Request/Success/Failure) - Get: 247/215/32, Put: 19/19/0, Post: 37/37/0, Delete: 0/0/0, GetAccountInfo: 0/0/0, Refresh: 615

I don’t know enough of what information is useful in that but posting just to suggest it seems there can be large variance in ‘(Request/Success/Failure)’.

0 Likes

#191

Which I wonder suggests that if you run a launcher alongside your vault and have a poorer experience, perhaps your bandwidth and resources are not helping the network move faster. In a large network perhaps vaults below average will be useful but too many slow vaults in a small network will have higher impact?

I don’t know much of practical routes to limiting node creation but wonder x1 per CPU is easier to implement than x1 per IP. If a node’s neighbours can see it hasn’t the bandwidth, perhaps they can shun that node - or pass a message to it that it could alert it’s owner of their opinion.

0 Likes

#192

What will the demo app be called in its final iteration? I assume it will continue to exist.

0 Likes

#193

No the list is empty as soon as I login. The demo app never quits/logs out etc. Although I just tested a bit more and with the launcher closed if I try to navigate the demo app it will then say it’s not logged in.

The process to reproduce this is:
open safe launcher and log in
open demo app and allow permission
close safe launcher
open safe launcher and login
Nothing in permissions list

If you like I can make a quick video tomorrow. I’m on Ubuntu 14.04 with latest safe binaries and apt-get up to date. It’s a fairly fresh os install (approx 5 weeks).

1 Like

#194

On Mint here and I’ve seen times that the launcher GUI closed and yet the process is still running, and yesterday I swear I saw two of them. Usually that is when I’ve crashed out of it for it’s stalling during upload or not responding quickly enough to me.

If you run
ps aux | grep 'launcher'
you can see if there is a safe launcher process running when the GUI is closed, that would allow the app to continue, though it’s odd a new launcher starts without challenging the port is unavailable.

0 Likes

#195

i just thought i’d upload a short video (this time only ~3.3MB … only the first minute of the original video … my internet is too slow and i’m 2 impatient to try&upload a larger file today =) )

http://elephant.safenet

2 Likes

#196

Works fine here :slight_smile:

krekc.safenet professional website :joy:

2 Likes

#197

:heart_eyes: :sunglasses: with audio! excellent site :smiley:

0 Likes

#198

Totally handmade as you can see :joy:

2 Likes

#199

yapp - i felt the love that went into design and stuff :hugging: :nerd:

1 Like

#200

Well someone had to do it…

http://fanny.craddock.safenet/

3 Likes

#201

Are these the first working " decentralized sites" we have been able to test as public?

  • How is this testnet going so far guys?
0 Likes