MaidSafe And What It Might Mean For Digital Asset Management

[chrisfostertv]

@fergish

The interesting thought that this raises is that corporate structures will be stuck with traditional insecure and expensive cloud solutions, because they will require things that just cannot be gotten from the SAFEnetwork.

Indeed, I think business will want the benefits of SAFE, but will be prevented by legal or internal policy constraints. But they could create their own private SAFEnetwork or even use single safe libraries.

I can definitely see it happening and would be fun to be involved in these types of roll-outs and their inevitable merging back into the worldwide SAFEnetwork.

I was trying to brainstorms these scenarios in this post:

Private<-->Public SAFEnetwork

**Edited post for clarity, hopefuly **Edit This scenario would be framed with the following in mind: SAFEnet aims to rid the world of servers within 10 years, an ambitious goal for sure. If this goes according to plan, the speed of the SAFE network would be super quick, we’d be running apps straight off the network over fibre. Wireless and mobile would be way better, battery life would be great, every device with storage would have a vault etc So it’s on the way to that sort of environmen…