Hello and welcome to Safe !
don't break the law
I would compare the invention of the Safe network to the invention of books in this aspect.
So suddently we have books, and people can do really bad things that break the law: they can write defamating words, they can reveal private , corporate, or state secrets, they can write reciepes for bombs, or publish classifieds for organ market.
Their use of the book technology is really bad in regard of ( some ) laws, or in regard of ( some ) moral or ethical values. But the book technology itself is not the fault here, it is simply unaware of what people use it for.
Safe will be the same. Some people will use it for the best , some for the really ugly. Unfortunately for our moms, the test will fail here !
But the creators of the network can not be blamed for what people use it for , just like we can't blame Gutemberg for the vast amount of really, really bad books the exist around the planet
In my opinion , this is a good thing. True neutrality combined with anonymity will arise in numerical publishing with Safe, and some people will use it to break ( some ) laws for the benefit of us all. Think whistleblowers here , for instance.
You could also think of the situation where someone lives in a very repressive country , and lives under laws that prevent them to publish anything related to political opposition. Before Safe , tbey would break law and go to jail or torture. After Safe they will break law and have a chance to live happy with their children.
Law is not always synonym of good !