Just got my Australian Crypto Tax notice guys *sigh*

Interesting. Thanks.

1 Like

My wife is an accountant here in the UK and this has come up a number of times with her work. In the UK apparently it can be a bit of a grey area. If you are just playing/gambling and it isn’t a frequent activity then they aren’t interested. If on the other hand you are a ‘trader’ who is obviously looking at it every day and making regular/freguent transactions then you are in business and will be taxed. The devil in the detail is what defines words like ‘regular/frequent’. As is usual in these things then it is best to be firmly one side of the grey or the other!


100% it’s grey, however they do now want every trade made and a calculation of the trade in £ which means sourcing an actual value for each type of crypto at that time. It’s a disaster really. So disposal to hmrc in crypto is now every use of crypto except only changing wallets for yourself, then though you need to account for fees. So hell on earth.
It would be better to work like shares, where you calculate the gain at the end, i.e. after trade X for Y for Z then at disposal (sell for £ or goods/service etc.) you pay CGT. hmrc call this a currency and treat it as a property. I suspect they will have to change this as it’s hell to report and must be 10X worse to audit.


In Australia, there is a semi exchange Coinspot that I use. It produces a comprehensive report of your transactions, by financial year, for no extra cost. Saves a lot of angst.


We have the same problem here. For this reason I hope MaidSafe coin will be converted to Safecoin withotu need to do ANY transaction. And safecoin will be able to be claimed using private keys from BTC address. If I do not need to do a transaction on BTC chain, then I am not making a coin exchange and it is not a tax event. But If I have to pay tax on this, then I will immediately lose lot of money on the conversion. They do not care about the story, they see transaction => tax event.


It’d be possible by snapshoting the MAID balances at a given Bitcoin block. There was good discussion about it here


And messages can be signed too and in the message can be the info required

But in any event once the conversion begins, I would think the price of MAID will drop towards zero anyhow, creating a loss for everyone


The purpose of converting is to give future created safecoin value by the conversion which makes MAID worth zero, but that is what it should do.

Or did I misunderstand you.

At conversion exchanges drops trading MAID and start trading Safecoin. So there is no loss, only conversion of value.

A conversion is a swap of value, not a loss.

1 Like

I was thinking of MAID held by people in their wallets.

But yes for exchanges there is a clear conversion and no net value change.

For the personal wallets then there is the situation that the safecoin received is for purchasing resources and thus zero value. Most governments like ours see buying crypto to purchase items as a zero gain/loss transaction in respect of the crypto

Now if the person sells safecoin for a profit then that would fall under a trading profit and different countries see these one off profits differently.

For instance in Australia that would be a capital gains (if held for more than a year from purchasing MAID)
Other countries do not tax them at all

In my head there is no difference between exchanges and personal wallets. Both individuals and exchanges updates to a SAFE-network wallet and use the same keys to access the funds. The only thing changed is the underlying technology and the label, but the value and amount have not changed. It should in my mind be seen as a label change and a conversion/swap, there is no need to talk about any loss as no loss would have happened.

MAID is representation of Safecoin, they are and represent the same asset. So you handle it as any brand conversion, the name changes but the asset is the same and represnting the same thing as before the conversion. If for example Apple change it’s name to bananas then bananas still are the same asset as when it’s name was Apple.


The thing @Antifragile is talking about is a smarter way of how to claim Safecoin. In his IMO better way the value of MAID will also be worthless after the snapshot.

If we do this in this smart way, you can get Safecoin without provable transaction, eg. its a swap where really no value is lost.

But if you wanna burn MAID to get Safecoin, it will be tax event in most jurisdictions. Then it will be not just a swap, but a swap costing you percentages based on capital income tax of your master.


I guess as long as you claim SafeCoins with the key to your MaidSafeCoins and still have access to your MaidSafeCoins this should essentially the same as an airdrop and taxed the same way. AFAIK, airdrops are usually considered gifts of value 0 and you then pay capital gains tax when they’re sold.

1 Like

That is the point, you pay capital gains when you sell your Safecoin, but not before. If I have to pay my 39% tax on MaidSafe to Safe coin conversion day that is not the same as if I have to pay it 10 years later when I decide to sell it. Also there is a mayor difference between BTC and anonymous coin. With anonymous coin, nobody knows I did receive any. They can’t know I claimed it or not. They can’t know when I sold it or if I sold it. Anonymous coins gives me an option to trade forever anonymous coins to tokens and pay only when I really convert that coin to CASH. I can send anonymously my coins back to original claim address and create transaction receipt years later and claim it was my first transaction but in fact I could trade years using those coins. And that is fair, to pay tax when I really get some money. Not to pay tax from nothing. It is brutal system that asks you to pay 39% tax from trading gains on token to token transaction and you can’t lover you tax income from losses. In crypto this means they killed trading. If the goal of this network is to bring freedom than the simple fact that you can hide if you claimed your coins or not is super important.


Simple rule:

If you can not sleep well with feeling of paying such a tax for not a good reason, than do not pay and cover it as much possible.

If you can not sleep well with feeling that you did not paid tax as you should, just pay it!

There is actually a huge difference. The difference is like trading of debts, accounts, etc. and you having credit at a store.

  • The safecoin in an exchange is the definition of being a trader.
    You can argue perhaps you did not trade and reduce any tax burden, but still it is the trading platform and purpose is to trade between coins.
  • The safecoin in your wallet (its on the safenetwork in your account) is the definition of having credit at a store that you can use to buy things.
    This creates a different purpose of the coins and thus not a trader and different tax rules in most countries.

Now it is possible to transfer your coin on the safenetwork wallet to someone else for exchange in cash (profit or loss) and that would be treated as a trade. But otherwise it is treated as credit in your store balance to buy resources from the network.

As an example in countries like mine which follow similar rules.

  • a trader is taxed as if the “profits” are straight income and taxed. So we have a situation where you pay a greater %age on the dollars earned above certain amounts. EG 20% for 25K to 35K and 35% for 35K to 45K and 45% above that. So if you earn 40K and then make 20K profit from trades then that 20K is taxed (0.35 * 5K + 0.45 * 15K)
  • normal wallet on safenetwork then any money taken as profit is taxed as capital gains.
    So if have MAID/safecoin for over a year then that 20K profit would result in a taxable income of 10K only and thus in the example above the tax is (0.35 * 5K + 0,45 * 5K)
    But if the coins were only used for buying resources then no tax at all

As you can see there is a huge difference as far as tax is concerned


It seems like we are talking about two different thing and it makes me confused. I might get back to the topic another day or week.

@lubinew That is what I’am trying to explain, there is no value gained or lost because the two names represents the same asset. MAID don’t lose value, it becomes Safecoin and the value of Safecoin is the same as MAID, because the two coins are the same asset. Because future Safecoin is not an new asset or a different asset, future Safecoin is the same as MAID because MAID is only a placeholder for Safecoin.

The problem I had with previous conversation was that it sounded like MAID and future Safecoin are two different assets. MAID and Safecoin represents and are the same asset, when Safecoin is created MAID is converted to Safecoin but the Safecoin is still the same asset as it was MAID, with the same amount/total amount, value purpose as when the conversion happens. There can’t be a tax event just by switching technology and name as long as it is the same asset, as I have read and understanded things. As I understand it there needs to be somekind of gain for it to be an tax event, not by changing name and underlying technology while still representing the same asset. Both MAID and future created Safecoin represents the same asses which main purpose is to buy service and goods in form of storage on the SAFE-network.
As future Safecoin and MAID are the same asset then there are no gains or losses, so there should be no taxable events happening.


I believe I understand what you are talking about and I think we have the disagreement only in the question of how problematic the transition will go tax-wise.

I am not a lawyer but imagine following very real situation where you bought MAID in 2017 per $40c each. Now its 2021 and MAID value is $3.00 and is eligible for claiming Safecoin which is (will be) also $3.00.

If you send it to the burn address and claim Safecoin, there is a provable transaction you have made. The thief office could look at it (and will IMO) as if you bought MAID for $0.40 and sell it at $3.00. They will tax you (depending on your master) a certain percentage of $2.60 (only if you prove the cost of $0.40, otherwise your base will be full $3.00). You say they will not do that because you basically just hold the same asset and you haven’t sold it. We disagree exactly there. IMO, they will use all the opportunities to steal from you and then it’s up to you to prove yourself unguilty. Good luck with that.

What I say is the following. Let’s not force holders to make a transaction to claim Safecoin because it’s more likely not to be seen as a tax event. Lets for example make a snapshot and make all the owners of private keys for bitcoin addresses holding MAID at the snapshot date to claim Safecoin 1:1.

In that scenario, you actually bought MAID for $0.40, it ramped up to $3.00 four years later but went to zero after the snapshot. You haven’t done any provable transaction after the initial buy-in. You just bought something four years ago which which you still own and has zero value now. Of course, you could claim (or maybe haven’t) your Safecoins worth $3.00 right after the snapshot.

I am only advocating there are different qualities of swap mechanisms we can use. Use the best one!


If the exchange is done off a trading platform then

Buy $0.40 Sell $3.00 then buy safecoin at $3.00 Thus resulting from the trade is still -$0.40 since to realisation of the trade into fiat. Unless they are not following trading rules

Now if you sell the safecoin for $4.00 later on then you have profit of $1.00 and pay tax on that. Unless the buying of MAID at $0.40 was done in the same year as selling safecoin at $4.00

Better to count in:
a) there are many jurisdictions
b) laws in every jurisdiction are changing constantly
c) interpretation of the laws is not a sure thing


Here us an update to the Australian tax authorities actions in the world of crypto

1 Like