Cheers for input, very helpful
That’s just plain wrong, a bug and needs fixed. All the reserved types are not currently reserved in code but will be (it’s an esy thing that needs focus).
Yes, but you can still do this.
A delete for instance though could allow a refund to be made of the payments to store it.
Unless you are seeing that delete being delete is wrong in some use case. If you are can you expalin the use case and why delete actually deleting would prevent that?
Using throwaway accounts could do what you say, even for type 0, but it seems you have another sneaky plan here. I am missing it and this is what we are looking for in these API discussion.