he literally asked what happened to the other 20% of what would be 100% and only 80% was mentioned , The interviewer themselves could of and perhaps should of mentioned afterwards “whats the other 20%”
Its a genuine question regarding the project , he even liked David Irvines answer because it was a satisfactory straightforward answer to a very straightforward question.
You then feel the need to jump down his throat , asking what he is doing to benefit the world, acting as if he doesn’t give a good answer, he doesn’t have the right to ask such questions. Claiming he even said that it wasn’t good enough for him . he never claimed it wasn’t good enough .
You even go further to insult him in an edit , he asked a straightforward question and you have claimed hidden intentions and contexts that don’t exist and then insulted him for those non existent contexts that you disagree with that only you see . Calm down and step away from the internet for a while perhaps