DataPaymentNet [26/7/23 Testnet] [Offline]

Dunno if this just has not been implemented yet…
That’s it exactly :+1:

First chunks, then we’ll get payment there.

6 Likes

FYIs, I suspect I’ll be bringing this down in the near future. Feels like we’ve learned a good amount from this one already. Thanks everyone for participating, as ever!! :bowing_man:

Edit: FYIs, since the other day we’ve lost one more node only. But we can also corroborate the mem increase over time. Also: more nodes looking full there.

16 Likes

My crystal ball says that is code for holepunchnet is at the doorstep.

9 Likes

I suspect not until that rising memory bug is squashed, so they may hold back until then.

5 Likes

Crystal ball :crystal_ball: vs Crystal ball. :crystal_ball:

It is not a necessity though is it, all tests so far have had the memory issue.

Would possibly be as exciting to get mem_squashed_net as hole punching is not directly affecting selfish little me.

6 Likes

:thinking: it has remained because it is elusive although I think there was a fix that wasn’t yet merged.

They may well want to add in hole punching if they are confident that it won’t make tracking down the memory leak more difficult. :man_shrugging:

I want it all, and I want it NOW. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

9 Likes