Informative article well done. I might only add that it might be worth mentioning how Safecoin is different to bitcoin and how that may affect it’s usability as a bitcoin replacement. Mainly Safecoin divisibility as was discussed (on and off with some off topic discussion) here and here.
I think a few people see Safe-“coin” just assume it is an alt-coin that follows Bitcoin divisibility standards, but AFAIK that is probably not the case so worth a mention.
The paragraph that starts with, “If MaidSafe’s project”…I have a question about, “…you could soon have a way to log into Facebook and your other online accounts all with one password…”. Is this an accurate statement? Are you referring to MaidSafe apps that are equivalents to the likes of Facebook, or are you actually talking about online accounts outside the Safe network, such as Facebook?
Great article @brianbbad. I have only one comment which is the same as @Hyperion35 - that you give the impression SAFE network will provide an interface to existing websites, whereas the one-logon-no-servers feature relates to the entirely encrypted SAFE network, and is not designed to interface with websites on the existing internet. If you have any questions about this I’ll be happy to try and answer them.
It’s a great article. It would be nice to mention how there are Farmers which provide the decentralized P2P hardware for the network and Builders that are app developers which create MaidSafe apps and websites to run on the network. Could also mention the types of apps that can be made. The one paragraph I mentioned is a good spot to explain the technology or maybe create a different paragraph. It’s a great article. Just some thoughts… I know it’s hard not to make it too technical. Great job.
Great article. Like it. You have a good style. I have a comment, a suggestion and a question
Your audience is well past the Mt. Gox scandal and reference to Mt. Gox makes this story seem stale, which you dont need, and anybody writing about Maid needs to be seen as “current”. Nobody talks about Mt. Gox anymore.
In the patent bit you seem to imply that patents are held by Maidsafe - the for profit company. I believe the patents have been transferred to the maidsafe foundation - a non profit charity.
Nice job. The second to last paragraph is a bit awkwardly worded and in my opinion throws off the rythmn a bit. You might want to widdle it down a bit, or maybe not use it.
You have a tense error on the last paragraph:
Only time will tell how big of an impact the SAFE Network has (should be “will have”) on everyday internet users.
On the paragraph about farmers, as a suggestion, to be more specific, you could say “computing resources, such as hard drive space, processing, and bandwidth” or just leave it alone of course lol.